Notes on the Tampa Crisis
Shane McGrath
Polizzotti translates the title of chapter two, part three of Virilio's
Speed and Politics as 'The Boarding of Metabolic Vehicles' and explains, in
a footnote, that the original is an 'untranslatable pun between arraisonnement,
"the boarding of ships for inspection," and raisonnement, "reasoning"'.
It seems like this is exactly the confusion the government is having now - who
knew John Howard spoke French? As I write, 30 Australian SAS troops are on board
the Tampa with 460 Afghanis and a handful of crew members, steadfastly refusing
to allow it to dock on Christmas Island. The events of the last few days open
new possibilities for understanding and resisting the contemptible actions of
the State.
from crisis to war
The current border crisis is quantitative, not qualitative; numerical rather
than normative. It's no use arguing about morals, since mathematical thresholds
define the changes in its administration. The most important of these thresholds,
although we can't know its exact statistics, was breached by the early 90s,
with the advent of mandatory detention, if not before. It was the point at which
the undocumented global movements of people in flight came to constitute an
alien power that could only be engaged militarily. Since then it's been a mistake
to talk about any Australian 'refugee policy'; policy has given way to strategy.
Without hyperbole, a new kind of war. This is why detention mirrors the internment
of those seen as potential agents of foreign powers in WWII.
It's enough to remember Ruddock on the ten thousand Iraqis about to assault
our borders; quantity is immediately linked to militarisation. It's the quantity,
not its constituents, that assault the nation. The government is at war against
a population - and see how quickly I'm forced into an utterly inadequate vocabulary
of nation-States - of 21 million; not a population of individuals, but population
as such.
the tampa
Of course, all of this has been dramatised most effectively by and around
The Tampa. The residents of Christmas Island are reportedly preparing tents
in the belief that it's inevitable the ship will dock there, but the government
insists these tents are for more military personnel, if/when the government
sends them. (Paul Bongiorno, Channel 10 News, 11:30 am, 30/8/2001) Howard seeks
legislation legitimising the use of military force to repel vessels suspected
of carrying people likely to make onshore asylum applications. This is a real
escalation in Australia's undeclared war against undocumented migration, but
in no way is it the commencement of hostilities.
state of emergency
The State has for some time been in a state of perpetual emergency, a state
of war, against the new minor economies - economies of drugs, weapons, information,
people (ideologically hypostatised as 'people-smuggling', the inverted projection
of the profiteering of ACM and other private prison contractors), and an endless
et cetera. These economies should not be misunderstood as merely transnational.
Trasnational economies - in the sense implied by corporate globalisation - tendentially
impose a recomposition of the nation-State, but in the interests and under the
direction of capital. The minor economies are better thought as anational or
antinational, irreducibly caustic to any and all State sovereignty, but also
to the current organisation of global capital. The State's responses to these
economies - from drug wars to the campaign against 'people smuggling' - also
share a number of characteristics; racist trade wars represented as matters
of law and order, but with no real chance of achieving their rhetorical aim
of ending the criminal trade.
Trajectories that are at once desiring and geographical, and that undermine
the State's capacity to administer the limits of the human, are some of the
common characteristics of the new minor economies. I call these economies 'minor'
to recall Deleuze and Guattari's 'minor literatures'; written in, but undoing
and stuttering, major languages, one of their key defining properties is an
absent people, a people who must be and are created in the specific stutterings
of language. The people of these economies have not yet arrived. Yet an imminent/immanent
logic inextricably connects the waning of State sovereignty with the shift of
those who engage the minor economies from illicit/illegal consumers, to constituents
in exodus.
the boarding of metabolic vehicles
I digress. 'The Boarding of Metabolic Vehicles' concerns what Virilio calls
'total war'. 'Born of the sea,' Virilio writes, 'total war, according to Admiral
Friedrich Ruge, aims "at destroying the honor, the identity, the very soul
of the enemy."' Familiar? Currently, the government is attempting to pass
legislation allowing guards in the detention centres to strip-search detainees
as young as ten. Putatively, this is to prevent escapes. In fact, as Mitropoulos
and Doherty-Rozensweig argue, the government has made the suffering of refugees
within Australia an active objective of its policy. The government's drive to
repel in advance further arrivals mandates an iconography of ethnic suffering,
the image of Australia's inhumanity becoming our newest ideological export.
'"Mr Ruddock's silly video," in which images of crocodiles and other
threatening species are used to frighten would be refugees' , inverts the tourist
ad to propagate a national negativity, to counter and deflect global trajectories.
Border strategy is above all juridico-geographical, about the State's administration
of space. This is why State sovereignty and refugee trajectories are properly
irreconcilable, as untranslatable as the pun of Virilio's title; indeed, it's
the same event of untranslatability in both cases. As Polizzotti notes, 'Virilio
will play on this [untranslatable pun] throughout the chapter'. This play concerns
the State's occupation of 'mindless' minority bodies; 'but still today,' Virilio
argues, 'the most widespread conviction with respect to the bodies of those
wanderers deprived of their identity, those living dead, is that they must be
occupied, inhabited, possessed by wills other than their own'. From the State's
perspective, the mindless bodies of refugees have been colonised by an extra-
and anti-national will, the will constituted in the mass times speed of undocumented
trajectories (will, of course, being nothing but force euphemised as reason,
in this case in the form of the supposed calculations of people-smugglers and
queue jumpers). The system of temporary protection Visas is at once part of
the policy of suffering designed to deter asylum applications, and a kind of
re-education specifically designed to break the refugee to the national will.
It translates, it is the violence that undermines the irreconcilable by forcing
the alien party onto the terrain of the State. It aborts the specific instance
of the untranslatable, but not the crisis of untranslatability with which the
State faces movements characterised their non-relation to the legal apparatuses
of nationalism.
total war
Total war is characterised by the simultaneity of the occupation of terrain,
vessels and bodies - or, to put it more clearly, vessels and bodies become territories
in strategic confrontations. And while it's clear that in the refugee war, there
is (on one side) no geographical territory in the traditional sense to struggle
over, the State will proceed by aggressing against the new 'territory' of movement
itself. Vessels, bodies and dynamism are the key elements of enemy advancement
the State seeks to capture, destroy and territorialise.
This is not, however, a case of the State seeking to capture or put a stop
to movement, even if certain battles have taken that form. The phase in which
the State could internalise and appropriate the nomad trajectories of people
in flight is coming dramatically to an end, as we see in the attempts to establish
the first off-shore detention centre on Nauru, and jettison Australian territories
like Christmas Island so as to draw in the national borders. The State aspires
to the condition of the fortifications of the Middle Ages, 'means of avoiding
carnage and of breaking up the enemy simply by constructing… "a totality
of mechanisms able to receive a defined form of energy (in this case, that of
the mobile mass of assailants), to transform it and finally to return it in
a more appropriate form."' Not to impose stasis, but to regulate movements
and control circulation, to render the antinational merely transnational
|