![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Part 05. IV. Initial Questions to the UN for Immediate Clarifications | ![]() |
The END |
Attachments UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLYDECLARATION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES. A/RES/1514 (XV) 14 DECEMBER 1960. The
General Assembly,
Mindful of the determination proclaimed by
the peoples of the world in the Charter Of The United Nations to reaffirm
faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human
person, in the equal rights of men and women, and of nations large and
small and to promoter social progress and better standards of life in
larger freedom, Conscious of the need for the creation of conditions of
stability and well-being and peaceful and friendly relations based on
respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of all
peoples, and of universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and
fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language
or religion,
Recognizing the
passionate yearning for freedom in all dependent peoples and the decisive
role of such peoples in the attainment of their independence,
Aware of the increasing conflicts resulting form the denial
or of impediments in the way of the freedom of such peoples, which
constitute a serious threat to world peace, Considering the
important role of the United Nations in assisting the movement for
independence in Trust and Non-self-Governing Territories, Recognizing that
the people of the world ardently desire the end of colonialism in all its
manifestations, Convinced that the continued existence of colonialism
prevent the development of international economic cooperation, impedes the
social cultural and economic development of dependent peoples and
militates against the United Nations ideal of universal peace, Affirming that peoples may for their own ends, freely
dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any
obligations arising out of international economic cooperation, based upon
the principle of mutual benefit, and international law, Believing
that the
process of liberation is irresistible and irreversible and that, in order
to avoid serious crises, on end must be put to colonialism and all
practices of segregation and discrimination associated therewith, Welcoming
the
emergence in recent years of a large number of dependent territories into
freedom and independence, and recognizing the increasingly powerful tends
towards freedom in such territories which have not yet attained
independence, Convinced
that all
peoples have an inalienable rights to complete freedom, the exercise of
their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory, Solemnly proclaims
the necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional end colonialism in
all its form and manifestations, And
to this end, Declares
that: 1.
The subjection of peoples to alien subjection, domination and
exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary
to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion
of world peace and cooperation. 2.
All peoples have the rights to self-determination; by virtue of
that rights they freely determine their political status and freely pursue
their economic, social and cultural development. 3.
Inadequacy of political, economic, social or educational
preparedness should NEVER serve as pretext for delaying independence. 4.
All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed
against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise
peacefully and freely their rights to complete independence, and the
integrity of their national territory shall be respected. 5.
Immediate steps shall be taken in Trust and Non-Self-Governing
Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained
independence, to transfer all powers to the people of those territories,
without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely
expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or
colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and
freedom. 6.
Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the
national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible
with the purposes and principles of the United Nations. 7.
All states shall observe faithfully and strictly all provisions of
the Charter of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and the present Declaration on the basis of equality,
non-interference in the internal affairs of all States, and respect for
the sovereign rights of all peoples and their territorial integrity.
U.N. RESOLUTION ON THE OUTCOME OF THE “Act of Free Choice” IN
WEST PAPUA, 1969 RESOLUTION
2504 (XXIV), 19 NOVEMBER 1969 The
General Assembly, (1)
take
note of the report of the Secretary-General and acknowledge with
appreciation the fulfilment by the Secretary-General and his
Representative of the tasks entrusted to them under the 1962 Agreement
between Indonesia and the Netherlands; and (2)
express
appreciation of any assistance provided through the Asian Development
Bank, through institutions of the United Nations or through other means to
the Indonesian Government in its efforts to promote the economic and
social development of West Irian. Introducing
the draft of resolution, the Foreign Minister of Indonesia said that his
Government had carried out its responsibility to hold the act of
free choice for the people of West Irian, with the assistance,
advice and participation of the Secretary-General's Representative, and
that the implementation of the final phase of the Agreement was not only
the honouring of an international agreement but also the end of a long
struggle for the unity and territorial integrity of Indonesia. The
Indonesian minister stated that it was easy to criticize the
implementation of such a complex political exercise, especially when
measuring it by so-called international standards that did not necessarily
fit to conditions and situations in Asia. West Irian was one of the most
undeveloped regions of the world, and the special circumstances prevailing
there, as well as the complex political background of the question, should
be taken into account. The people of West Irian had firmly expressed their
will to remain a part of Indonesia. The
Foreign Minister of the Netherlands stated that the interests of the
people of West Irian had been the paramount concern of the Netherlands:
his country would continue to translate that concern into concrete action
that would reflect the modified circumstances. The
Secretary-General and his Representative had carried out their tasks in a
exemplary manner, the Netherlands representative said. However, doubts on
the part of the Netherlands with respect to the 1962 Agreement had not
been moved in the final phase of its implementation. The report of the
Secretary-General's Representative confirmed, to some extent, that those
doubts were not unjustified, he added. Nevertheless, the Netherlands
recognizes and abides by the outcome of the act of self-determination. The
method and procedures applied in the implementation of the act of free
choice were widely commented upon. Ghana
and Sierra Leone were among members that expressed reservation concerning
the method followed and considered that the people of West Irian had not
exercised their right to self-determination within the meaning of the
Indonesian-Netherlands Agreement. Ghana
noted it was a matter of record that Indonesia had rejected the method
proposed by the Secretary-General's Representative for the act of free
choice. Because of the questionable method used in ascertaining the will
of the West Irian people, Ghana could not subscribe to a draft resolution
that sought a gloss over what it considered to be essential violations of
the 1962 Agreement. Ghana
consequently proposed an amendment to the draft resolution. Bu the
amendment, the Assembly would: (1)
take
note of the report of the Secretary-General and acknowledge with
appreciation the fulfilment by the Secretary-General and his
Representative of the tasks entrusted to them under the 1962 Agreement
between Indonesia and the Netherlands; (2)
decide
that the people of West Irian should be given a further opportunity, by
the end of 1975, to carry out the act of free choice envisaged in the
Agreement, and (3)
express
appreciation of any assistance provided through the Asian Development
Bank, through institutions of the United Nations or through other means to
the Indonesian Government in its efforts to promote the economic and
social development of West Irian. Togo
also expressing misgivings about the method chosen, recalled that the
General Assembly, by its resolution (1514) of 14 December 1960 (on the
granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples), had
emphasized that a lack of political, economic, and social preparation
could never serve as a pretext to delay independence of any country. Togo
supported Ghanaian amendment. Dahomey and the Democratic Republic of Congo
also expressed support for the Ghanaian amendment. Speaking
in support of the six-power draft resolution, Algeria, Burma, India, Iran,
Japan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand variously stated that
the issue before the Assembly was NOT one of self-determination of the
national unity, but of the affirmation of the national unity and
territorial integrity of the Republic of Indonesia. West Irian was a
SPECIAL CASE. India said, and the method used for the act of free choice
there could not be considered under any circumstances a precedent for
cases of self-determination in territories still under colonial
domination. Moreover,
Malaysia pointed out, the Agreement was bilateral; any objection or
reservation about its implementation should come from the Netherlands and
not from the Assembly, which was only called upon to take not (in witness)
of the Secretary-General's report. Saudi
Arabia added that the amendment submitted by Ghana did not seek to amend
the draft resolution but rather an agreement between two Member States. Indonesian
stressed that no approval was required either of the Agreement itself or
of the Secretary-General's report; Indonesia could not accept the Ghanaian
amendment in its present form. On
19 November, a motion by Ghana to have a paragraph-by-paragraph vote on
its amendment was rejected by a vote of 58 to 31, with 24 abstentions. The
Ghanaian amendment as a whole was then put to the vote and was rejected by
a roll-call cote of 60 to 15, with 39 abstentions. At
the request of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the phrase "Takes
note of report of the Secretary-General" in the first operative
paragraph of the six-power draft resolution was voted on separately and
was adopted by 80 votes to 6, with 14 abstentions. The first paragraph as
a whole was the adopted by 86 cotes to 0, with 27 abstentions. The
test as a whole was adopted as Resolution 2504 (XXIV) by a roll-call vote
of 84 to 0, with 30 abstentions. (For text of resolution and voting
details, see DOCUMENTARY REFERENCE below). RESOLUTION
2504 (XXIV), as
proposed by six-powers, AL.574, adopted by Assembly on 19 November 1969,
meeting 1813, by roll-call vote of 84 to 0, with 40 abstentions as
follows: In
favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Burma, Byelorussia SSR, Colombia, Canada, Ceylon, Chile, China,
Cuba, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ethiopia,
Guinea, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland,
Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Luxemburg, Madagascar,
Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Nepal,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama,
Peru, The Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia,
Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, Southern Yemen, Spain, Sudan, Sweden,
Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukrainian, SSR, USSR, United Arab
Republic, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Yemen, and Yugoslavia. Against:
-- n o n e --- (2) Appreciates any assistance provided through the
Asian Development Bank, through institutions of the United Nations or
through other means to the Government of Indonesia in its efforts to
promote economic and social development in West Irian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Plenary
Meeting - 1813 19 December 1969 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Part 05. IV. Initial Questions to the UN for Immediate Clarifications | ![]() |
The END |