Attachments

• IV. INITIAL QUESTIONS TO THE U.N.  FOR IMMEDIATE CLARIFICATIONS
• TERRITORIAL POLITICAL STATUS IN THE LIGHT OF UNGA RESOLUTION 1514(XV), 14 DECEMBER 1960

• REFERENDUM PRACTICES IN THE LIGHT OF THE NEW YORK AGREEMENT - 1962

• TERRITORIAL AND POLITICAL STATUS OF WEST PAPUA IN THE LIGHT OF UNGA RESOLUTION 2504 (XXIV), 19 NOVEMBER 1969

IV.   INITIAL QUESTIONS TO THE U.N.  FOR IMMEDIATE CLARIFICATIONS:

Any clarification by the United Nations and formal announcement or dissemination on the following questions will be of much assistance in the West Papuans efforts to settle all matters pertaining to existing Human Rights Violations both Internationally and nationally:

A.  TERRITORIAL POLITICAL STATUS IN THE LIGHT OF UNGA RESOLUTION 1514(XV), 14 DECEMBER 1960:

1.   When was the International Political Status of West Papua as

      ‘Non-Self-Governing Territory’ officially   stripped   off   by the United Nations and, on what legal base?

2.   When was the ‘Right To Decolonization’ of West Papua officially aborted by the United Nations and, on what legal base?

3.   When was West Papua officially excluded by the United Nations from the Decolonization List and, on what legal base?

4.   Malaysia, East Timor and West Papua were in the same ‘UN Decolonization Program’ and in the same Indonesian Annexation Plan.  A Thorough and reasonable explanation has to be provided by the United Nations as to why, discrimination occurred in the implementation of all applicable, related international instruments; whereby, in the case of Malaysia all were completely observed - in the case of East Timor all were finally made up, while in the case of West Papua all related international laws were totally ignored and unobserved?

B.   REFERENDUM PRACTICES IN THE LIGHT OF THE NEW YORK AGREEMENT - 1962:

1.   The official exclusion of ‘native’ Papuan Representatives in the negotiation process, Papuan Plenipotentiaries in the signing of the Agreement and intended SECRET NEGOTIATIONS approach adopted. 

2.   Deliberate shift of the meanings of questionable terminologies applied by the negotiating parties in the New York Agreement - 1962:

a.  Act Of Self-Determination  (why Act Of Free Choice?)

b.  ‘Musyawarah’ = deliberation (why  ‘consultation’?)

a.   ‘One man one vote’ (why  ‘representation’?)

           C. TERRITORIAL AND POLITICAL STATUS OF WEST PAPUA IN THE LIGHT OF UNGA RESOLUTION 2504 (XXIV), 19 NOVEMBER 1969:

                  The Resolution does not contain any clear definition pertaining to the political status of West Papua.  Clarification is required for the following:

1.    Articles    containing    ABORTION   of    Decolonization    in 

       Process, and   REMOVAL   of   West Papua from the UN  

       Decolonization List.

2.    Articles containing international formal recognition of the territory as an integral part of Indonesia with all legal backup references related thereto (On what legal basis, West Papua is recognized internationally as a part of Indonesia?)

3.    Article 1 of the Resolution contains appreciation for the completion of all tasks of the UN Secretary-General in the implementation of the New York Agreement.  The Agreement itself was a fraud.   Involvement of UN in support of such a scandalous decolonisation process could be classified as an IGNOMINY. 

4.    Appreciations in support of international assistance to Indonesia for the development in Irian Jaya as contained in Article 2 of the Resolution  (as it could be defined as formal commencement of international presence in the field Natural Resources exploitation that have become one of the main triggering aspects of today’s Human Rights Violations).

5.  ‘Take-note’ in the adoption of the resolution clearly reflects total incapability of the UNGA and the absolute weakness of the Resolution itself in terms of applicable International Laws.

Attachments